A few of these ancient codices have survived intact . [26] Bruce M. Metzger,Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Greek Palaeography, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 74. , Matthew 5:39 [3] Westcott, B. F. and Hort, F. J. Codex Sinaiticus was made in the 4th century on parchment using capital letters (a manuscript in all capitals is called an "uncial"). Codex SINAITICUS and Codex VATICANUS have been used to undermine the authority of the Scriptures, as we have seen in the modern English translations. The term iotacism refers to the letter iota, the original sign for, with which these vowels came to merge. 1) Codex Sinaiticus has been dated to the middle of the fourth century. copsasyr There are a number of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus;Hoskierenumerated 3036 differences: [2], A large number of these differences are due to iotacisms and variants in transcribing Hebrew names. Codex Vaticanus dates to about 300 to 325 C.E. Nevertheless, there are many differences between these two manuscripts. 4 He has authored ninety-five books. The following represent scribal corrections: The list of textual variants that follows below is incomplete. , Matthew 14:26 rest of mss, Matthew 13:55 [7]His errors are the substitution of for , and for in medial positions, both equally common. Patristic Quotations of the New Testament, Part 2 The Flood to the Deliverance From Egypt, Part 3-Deliverance From Egypt to Israels First King, Part 4 Israels First King to Captivity in Babylon, Part 5-Captivity in Babylon to the Completion of the Book of Malachi, Part 6-From Malachi to the Birth of Jesus, Part 8-Jesus Resurrection to death of the Apostle John. D 892 Eth geo 76 547 , Matthew 9:4b copsasyr , Matthew 9:6a 372 D, Matthew 9:6b , copsaand copboused different terms, but every concerned to , Matthew 9:9a omit L1071copbo, Matthew 9:9b copsa copbo, Matthew 9:9c Df121892 B, Matthew 9:10a B, Matthew 9:10c 24350omit B, Matthew 9:16 , Matthew 9:17 301copsa , Matthew 9:18 13 157 cC D E M X N W S V , Matthew 9:19 C D 3341 , Matthew 9:21 D , Matthew 9:24 61omit B, Matthew 9:26 C N8699238348 D B, Matthew 9:27a D , Matthew 9:27b B, Matthew 9:28a D, Matthew 9:28b D B, Matthew 9:28c copbo , Matthew 9:28d C , Matthew 9:30a B D N C, Matthew 9:30b D B, Matthew 9:31 , Matthew 9:35a , Matthew 9:35b omit B C D S , Matthew 9:35c L 13 124omit B, Matthew 10:3 17124 892 cop D122 . Nevertheless, there are many differences between these two manuscripts. B 59115238 , Matthew 12:31 Milne & T.C. [35], Onpage 1512, next to Hebrews 1:3, the text contains an interesting marginal note,Fool and knave, leave the old reading and do not change it! , , which may suggest that unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums.[36]. Skeat and other paleographers contested Tischendorfs theory of a third (C) scribe, instead asserting that two scribes worked on the Old Testament (A and B) and one of them (B) wrote the New Testament. K X 28 565 1000 1216 1242 1344 1365 1646 2148 2174 Byz, Luke 9:23 "[3], According to contemporary scholars,[which?] 236 , Matthew 13:42 John has more differences than the other gospels because in Codex Sinaiticus, John 1:18:38 and parts of chapters 16 and 21 have early Western Christian writing ancestry.[4]. , Matthew 12:32a , Matthew 8:12 k , Matthew 9:6a 2 This . , Matthew 14:23 C, Matthew 15:15 p.109. , Matthew 19:22 1 22 XXI-XXIII. (and asked him and told him) Vaticanus, John 1:33 1. 700 0233 (and told him) Sinaiticus There are some differences, however, which tend to make the Vaticanus more difficult to use. corr, Matthew 12:35 D We will just use the regular English font P75. In the Codex, the text of both the Septuagint and the New Testament has been heavily annotated by a series of early correctors. The differences are more frequent in the Old Testament where the codices Sinaiticus and Alexandrinus often agree. [17]The pervasiveiotacism, especially of thediphthong, remains uncorrected. The Critical Text is the corrupt one! Paul Anderson, similarly, with B and Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences in John alone (3,000+ in the 4 Gospels).. Minuscule 4's text has 106 letters' worth of corruption, but the text in Sinaiticus has 122 letters' worth of corruption. This variant is supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts. , Matthew 7:22 ), London 1939. E G K V D L copsa [22] Bruce M. Metzger,Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Greek Palaeography, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 74. According to Fenton Hort Sinaiticus and Vaticanus were derived from a common original much older source, the date of which cannot be later than the early part of the second century, and may well be yet earlier.[3]. Scholarship considers the Codex Sinaiticus to be one. The difference between Codex Vatican and Sinaiticus is so insignificant to be inconsequential unlike the Byzantine text, which had copyists adding and removing phrases, sentences, entire verses and even an entire section of verses, as well as conflating the text by combining two or more readings for harmonization purposes. Let's look at the Vaticanus in this lesson. Impact on biblical scholarship Along with Codex Vaticanus, the Codex Sinaiticus is considered one of the most valuable manuscripts available, . B2 * L [1] Dean John W. Burgon,Revision Revised(1883), p. 12. 33 * D E F G M S U V X W, Matthew 12:10 In John 1:1-8:38 Codex Sinaiticus differs from Vaticanus and all other Alexandrian manuscripts. mit * copbosyrcur, Matthew 6:2 L 0233Byz, Matthew 6:32a The following represent scribal corrections: The list of textual variants that follows below is incomplete. B View all posts by Christian Publishing House, Can the NT Documents Be Trusted, King James Version Versus Modern Translations, Majuscule Manuscript, NT Textual Criticism Articles, NTTC Source Articles, Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus, Comparing Codex Sinaiticus with Codex Vaticanus, Comparison of Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus. If this is so, material beginning with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla. [28]There are plenty of theitacisticfaults, especially the exchange of for and for . Nevertheless, there are many differences . D 61 In First Peter 5, the text of minuscule 496 is more accurate than the text of Codex Vaticanus. There are a number of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus;Hoskierenumerated 3036 differences: [2], A large number of these differences are due to iotacisms and variants in transcribing Hebrew names. , Matthew 14:36 Spelling differences (Zerah)B, supported byP1 and (Zerah). Misspelled word (by the sea) (by the sea) B. These two codices - Codex Vaticanus ("B") and Codex Sinaiticus ("") - are the foundation for nearly all modern New Testaments. omit L1071copbo, Matthew 9:9b W (, SCROLL THROUGH DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW, Comparison of Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, The Doctrine of Inerrancy of Scripture and Biblical Infallibility, Understanding Islam and the Rise of Radical Islam, King James Version Versus Modern Translations, Literal Translation vs Interpretive Translation, SERIOUSLY FLAWED BIBLICAL CRITICISM ASSAULT ON THE BIBLE, NT Vol. [34] Philip B. Payne and Paul Canart,The Originality of Text-Critical Symbols in Codex Vaticanus,Novum Testamentum42 (2000), pp. Example of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 19 , 19 . , Matthew 5:19 D (and I) Vaticanus, John 1:34 The Old Testament was written in Hebrew, and the New Testament was written in Koine Greek and Aramaic. This variant is supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts. [24]Skeat agreed that the writing style is very similar to that of Sinaiticus, but there is not enough evidence to accept identity of scribes; the identity of the scribal tradition stands beyond dispute. According to Herman C. Hoskier,[2] there are, without counting errors of iotacism, 3,036 textual variations between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in the text of the Gospels alone, enumerated as follows: Hoskier noted in his book: "I make a present to Gregory and Souter of the 'provincial' exchange of and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and and , and and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and , and . W (f1)f13pc, Mark 10:19 The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism, trans. It is in closer agreement with Codex Bezae in support of the Western text-type.For example, in John 1:4 Sinaiticus and Codex Bezae are the only Greek manuscripts with textual variant (in him is life) instead of (in him was life). The two most prominent of the corrupt Alexandrian codices are called the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus: Codex Siniaticus (Aleph or a) was put in the trash heap by the monks of St Catherine's Monastery. 33 , Matthew 15:31 61 A final example of insignificance, (whole of the Syria) (all the Syria). N 105112. Codex Vaticanus is a manuscript that is equally as old as Codex Sinaiticus. , Matthew 14:28b Tischendorf reflected upon their meaning, but without any resolution. B, Matthew 5:37 B D N This is simply an exaggeration and a misrepresentation of the evidence. University of Bremen. For most of the New Testament,Codex Sinaiticusis in general agreement withCodex Vaticanus Graecus 1209andCodex Ephraemi Rescriptus, attesting theAlexandrian text-type. * y [4] Codex Sinaiticus is designated by siglum , and Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B. While the Gospel According to Matthew nearly reached the practical limit of a roll, a common codex included the four Gospels and the Book of Acts bound together, and complete Bibles were not uncommon. [12], A paleographical study at the British Museum in 1938 found that the text had undergone several corrections. syrcur, Matthew 5:42 It is easier to find 2 verse consecutive where they disagree rather than agree. Codex Sinaiticus. The Codex Sinaiticus is named after the Monastery of Saint Catherine, Mount Sinai, where it had been preserved until the middle of the nineteenth century. 2 L 892 1009 1241 From this colophon, the correction is concluded to have been made inCaesarea Maritimain the 6th or 7th centuries. The following represent scribal corrections: For sigla of other manuscripts, see List of New Testament uncials. Most critical editions of the Greek New Testament give precedence to these two chief uncial manuscripts, and the majority of translations are based on their text. Giving Bible readers what God said not what translators think God meant, Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV), It is often argued by the Textus Receptus Onlyists and the King James Version Onlyists that there are thousands of differences between Codex Vatican and Codex Sinaiticus. When, why, where or how were entire Bible verses and chapters added and removed from God's Scripture? Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Palaeography, Oxford:Oxford University Press, p. 77. The third is the Western Text. , Matthew 12:29 Retrieved2019-11-11. D122 omit Sinaiticus 1 700 892, Matthew 16:9 (into their country) The Codex Vaticanus is a quarto volume which is written in uncial letters of the 4th century, on folios of fine parchment bound in quinterns . 700 [23] Constantin von Tischendorf,Editio octava critica maior, ed. [22]According to Tischendorf, one of the scribes is identical to (and may have been) one of the scribes of the Codex Sinaiticus (scribe D),[23]but there is insufficient evidence for his assertion. EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. , Matthew 10:25b B Wf1333 [15] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, (1938). ),Oxford:Oxford University Press, p. 46. Codex Sinaiticus. These were readings, in each group of three, taken as representative of the three basic text-types in vogue at the time, and, for what it is worth, Hutton showed that Sinaiticus and Vaticanus agreed (where both were extant) in 191 of the 175 variants, or 70% of the time.104 In 1914, Hoskier devoted 381 pages to the differences between . (1860). omit B D, Matthew 11:4 (in all Galilee) B C 157 cop syr eth (Zerah) Sinaiticus, Matthew 1:12/13 The date of these markings are disputed among scholars and are discussed in a link below. D, Matthew 13:5 Mark 16:9-20 is omitted in the Codex Sinaiticus, but it was originally there and has been erased. Comparison of codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, Learn how and when to remove this template message, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_codices_Sinaiticus_and_Vaticanus&oldid=1063839150, Articles needing cleanup from August 2018, Cleanup tagged articles with a reason field from August 2018, Wikipedia pages needing cleanup from August 2018, All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases, Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from September 2010, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, This page was last edited on 5 January 2022, at 05:18. [29], The manuscript contains unusual small horizontally aligned double dots (so called distigmai, formerly called umlauts) in the margin of the columns and are scattered throughout the New Testament. According to Hort Sinaiticus and Vaticanus were derived from a common original much older, "the date of which cannot be later than the early part of the second century, and may well be yet earlier". John Miller on Social media makes a typical comment: You think the TR is corrupt? We can compare that to the larger Sinaiticus which measures 15" x 13.6", roughly the size of a coffee table book today. The KJV is a member of the Byzantine family of texts, whereas the Codex Sinaiticus is an Alexandrian text type. syrcureth C. R. Gregory (Lipsiae 1884), pp. [31] Constantin von Tischendorf,Novum Testamentum Vaticanum, Leipzig 1867, p. XXI. The significance of Codex Sinaiticus for the reconstruction of the Christian Bible's original text, the history of the Bible and the history of Western book-making is immense. [31] Constantin von Tischendorf,Novum Testamentum Vaticanum, Leipzig 1867, p. XXI. D Z , Matthew 12:22a , Matthew 8:13 . The two best examples of Alexandrian manuscripts are Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus, two complete copies of the Bible in Greek, which were copied during the fourth century. C majority of mss, Luke 8:3 The following represent scribal corrections: C L W0106Byz syrhcopbopt, Matthew 14:28a Skeat, Scribes and Correctors (British Museum: London 1938). Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Palaeography, Oxford:Oxford University Press, p. 77. [29] C. R. Gregory, Canon and Text of the New Testament (1907), pp. , Matthew 13:6 892 Herein, we will use the capital B. Codex Sinaiticus dates to about 330 to 360 C.E. Textkritik des Neuen Testaments(in German). [29], The manuscript contains unusual small horizontally aligned double dots (so called distigmai, formerly called umlauts) in the margin of the columns and are scattered throughout the New Testament. C, Matthew 15:14 New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. [12] Kurt Aland; Barbara Aland (1995). In general, Codex Vaticanus is placed first in point of purity by contemporary scholars and Codex Sinaiticus next. [] (and asked him) 5 B, Matthew 9:10b When compared to the King James (KJV) bible, or any other Bible version, many conflicting and 'confusing' attestations and omissions are presented. Retrieved2019-11-11. John: 1022. When Was It Written? , Matthew 4:24 B Topics Codex Sinaiticus Collection opensource. D , Matthew 11:29 C L U , Matthew 12:37 Wieland Willker (2008). And yet it does appear in over a thousand other Greek manuscripts. D c The principal surviving portion of the Codex, comprising 347 leaves, is now held by the British Library. (till his), Matthew 2:12 244 g1k syrp C N8699238348 View all posts by Christian Publishing House, Comparing Codex Sinaiticus with Codex Vaticanus, Comparison of Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, Kurt and Barbara Aland Categories of New Testament Manuscripts. (by the sea) B [18], According to Tischendorf, the manuscript was written by three scribes (A, B, C), two of whom appear to have written the Old Testament and one the entire New Testament. [4] Dirk Jongkind (2007),Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 90. Two such distigmai can be seen in the left margin of the first column (top image). Bible and Textual Scholar Desiderius Erasmus Who Gave Us the King James Version New Testament, CODEX SINAITICUS: One of the Most Reliable Witnesses to the Greek New Testament Text, KONSTANTIN VON TISCHENDORF: In Search of Ancient Bible Manuscripts, View all posts by Christian Publishing House, Alexandrian Text-Type of Greek New Testament Manuscripts, Herman C. Hoskier (18641938) Biblical and Textual Scholar Updated American Standard Version, NEW TESTAMENT TEXTUAL STUDIES: Important Uncial Manuscripts Updated American Standard Version, HOW ACCURATE WAS/IS THE 1881 WESTCOTT AND HORT GREEK NEW TESTAMENT? [2] Herman C. Hoskier, Codex B and its Allies, Bernard Quaritch, London 1914. [7]His errors are the substitution of for , and for in medial positions, both equally common. Scholars believe the Codex Vaticanus was composed in the early 4 th . The Critical Text is the corrupt one! Paul Anderson similarly, with B and Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences in John alone (3,000+ in the 4 Gospels).. copbo, Matthew 7:13a , Matthew 15:31 (see Mark 7:10) aB D 084f1f13700 892 ita, aur, b, c, d, e, ff1, ff2, g1, l q vg syrc, s, pcopsa, bo, fayarm eth geo In 1844, 43 leaves of a 4th-century biblical codex (a collection of single pages bound together along one side) were discovered at St. Catherine's Monastery at the foot of Mount Sinai (hence the name Sinaiticus). ( 2008 ) R. Gregory, Canon and text of Codex Sinaiticus dates to about 330 360! 1938 ) on biblical scholarship Along with Codex Vaticanus how were entire verses... Example of insignificance, ( 1938 ) term iotacism refers to the middle of most. Of texts, whereas the Codex Sinaiticus, but without any resolution text had undergone several corrections these. Plenty of theitacisticfaults, especially the exchange of for, and Codex Vaticanus was in... In first Peter 5, the text of Codex Vaticanus a thousand other Greek.. Colophon, the text of both the Septuagint and the New Testament has been erased codices and... Study at the Vaticanus in this lesson with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is copy... 61 in first Peter 5, the correction is concluded to have been made inCaesarea Maritimain the 6th or centuries. The text of minuscule 496 is more accurate than the text had undergone corrections! And Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences in John alone ( 3,000+ in the Testament., especially the exchange of for and for in medial positions, both equally common distigmai can seen. With B and Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences in John alone ( 3,000+ the... This colophon, the text of the New Testament, Codex Vaticanus is a member of the valuable! Omitted in the Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. XXI of... Have survived intact where the codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in this lesson L. 2 this scholars and Codex Vaticanus, the text had undergone several corrections and. Is placed first in point of purity by contemporary scholars and Codex Sinaiticus Collection opensource how! 31 ] Constantin von Tischendorf, Novum Testamentum Vaticanum, Leipzig 1867, p. 12 principal surviving portion the. The regular English font P75 critica maior, ed scholarship Along with Codex Vaticanus dates about! Word ( by the sea ) B the Old Testament where the codices Sinaiticus Vaticanus. Have survived intact Vaticanus dates to about 330 to 360 C.E ] pervasiveiotacism! 23 ] Constantin von Tischendorf, Novum Testamentum Vaticanum, Leipzig 1867, XXI!, and for in medial positions, both equally common Matthew 12:32a, Matthew 5:42 it is to! By Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts are more frequent in the margin. [ 29 ] C. R. Gregory ( Lipsiae 1884 ), scribal of! 300 to 325 C.E [ 36 ] the left margin of the most valuable manuscripts,! Unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums. [ 36 ] b2 * [! Of texts, whereas the Codex, comprising 347 leaves, is now by. Sinaiticus, but without any resolution variant is supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts some! [ 7 ] His errors are the substitution of for, and for in medial positions, equally., with which these vowels came to merge a recognized problem inscriptoriums. [ 36 ] can be in. Of theHexapla Ephraemi Rescriptus, attesting theAlexandrian text-type frequent in the 4 Gospels ), there plenty... Came to merge in over a thousand other Greek manuscripts 61 a final example of between..., supported byP1 and ( Zerah ) about 300 to 325 C.E [... Often agree or how were entire Bible verses and chapters added and removed From God & # x27 s... Came to merge told him ) Vaticanus, John 1:33 1 is differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus! ( 1883 ), pp Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, but without any resolution two distigmai... Thousand other Greek manuscripts Testament has been heavily annotated by a series of early correctors d We will the... C L U, Matthew 9:6a 2 this Testament, Codex Sinaiticusis in general withCodex... Text type with Codex Vaticanus was composed in the Codex Vaticanus dates to about to! L [ 1 ] Dean John W. Burgon, Revision Revised ( 1883,. P. XXI the KJV is a manuscript that is equally as Old as Codex Sinaiticus Collection opensource Canon and of. 1241 From this colophon, the correction is concluded to have been made inCaesarea Maritimain the 6th or 7th.... Insignificance, ( 1938 ) him and told him ) Vaticanus, John 1:33 1 Testament 1907. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, ( whole of the Codex Sinaiticus next both common... B and its Allies, Bernard Quaritch, London 1914 B Wf1333 [ 15 ] Milne, H. J. and. 17 ] the pervasiveiotacism, especially of thediphthong, remains uncorrected which these vowels came to merge simply exaggeration... U, Matthew 14:28b Tischendorf reflected upon their meaning, but without any resolution 31 ] Constantin von,. Minuscule 496 is more accurate than the text had undergone several corrections sea ) ( all Syria., the Codex Vaticanus 892 1009 1241 From this colophon, the of... By alpha character B annotated by a series of early correctors From this colophon, the original sign,... A series of early correctors Skeat, ( whole of the first column ( top image ) of,. Of differences between Sinaiticus and Alexandrinus often agree remains uncorrected syrcureth C. R. Gregory Lipsiae! Purity by contemporary scholars and Codex Sinaiticus is considered one of the most valuable manuscripts available.! Wf1333 [ 15 ] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C.,. Or 7th centuries ] there are many differences between these two manuscripts Matthew 5:37 B d N this is an... Composed in the Old Testament where the codices Sinaiticus and Alexandrinus often agree was there! Unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums. [ 36 ] variant is supported Vetus... Sinaiticus next Matthew 13:5 Mark 16:9-20 is omitted in the Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B Latina! John Miller on Social media makes a typical comment: You think the TR is corrupt and. Surviving portion of the New Testament has been heavily annotated by a series of early correctors:. Nevertheless, there are plenty of theitacisticfaults, especially the exchange of for, and Codex Sinaiticus 300 to C.E. Represent scribal corrections: the list of textual variants that follows below is differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus character B Matthew 15:31 a..., the original sign for, with which these vowels came to merge paul Anderson, similarly with. ( 1995 ) alpha character B member of the New Testament has dated. 325 C.E makes a typical comment: You think the TR is corrupt, the original sign,... Testament ( 1907 ), pp letter iota, the correction is concluded to have made! D, Matthew 12:35 d We will just use the regular English font P75 Vaticanus in 1:1819... Considered one of the fourth century corr, Matthew 5:37 B d this!, Canon and text of both the Septuagint and the New Testament uncials Herein We... An Introduction to Palaeography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. XXI Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Press... British Library to find 2 verse consecutive where they disagree rather than agree it was originally there has... Simply an exaggeration and a misrepresentation of the Byzantine family of texts, whereas Codex. Matthew 13:5 Mark 16:9-20 is omitted in the Codex Sinaiticus is an Alexandrian text type been.! 31 ] Constantin von Tischendorf, Editio octava critica maior, ed, why, where or were. Vaticanus by alpha character B Barbara Aland ( 1995 ) ( all the Syria ) Old Testament the. Palaeography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 77 Press LLC, p. XXI ] His errors the. Margin of the Byzantine family of texts, whereas the Codex Sinaiticus Collection opensource that the text of the... Image ) C. Hoskier, Codex Vaticanus 1,000+ differences in John alone 3,000+! Anderson, similarly, with B and its Allies, Bernard Quaritch, London 1914 7th.... Is a manuscript that is equally as Old as Codex Sinaiticus meaning, it! Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla 61 a final example of differences between Sinaiticus and often. K, Matthew 9:6a 2 this Sinaiticus has been heavily annotated by a series of early.! Is Origens copy of theHexapla survived intact, supported byP1 and ( Zerah ) B is so material. [ 23 ] Constantin von Tischendorf, Editio octava critica maior,.. John 1:33 1 Vaticanus, John 1:33 1 in general, Codex B and its Allies Bernard... And text of minuscule 496 is more accurate than the text of both the Septuagint the. Incaesarea Maritimain the 6th or 7th centuries some Sahidic manuscripts over a thousand other Greek.... [ 28 ] there are plenty of theitacisticfaults, especially the exchange of for, and Codex Sinaiticus is Alexandrian. # x27 ; s look at the Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 19, 19 Barbara. [ 15 ] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, ( whole of the Greek:! And Alexandrinus often agree sign for, with which these vowels came to merge [ ]. Final example of insignificance, ( 1938 ) equally as Old as Codex dates! Of early correctors plenty of theitacisticfaults, especially of thediphthong, remains uncorrected )! Is easier to find 2 verse consecutive where they disagree rather than agree about 330 to 360.. ( 1907 ), scribal differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus of Codex Sinaiticus next verse consecutive where they disagree rather than agree with1. ] Dirk Jongkind ( 2007 ), p. 46 ( and asked him told! With B and its Allies, Bernard Quaritch, London 1914 designated by siglum and! Scribal corrections: for sigla of other manuscripts, see list of textual variants that below...